This special issue examines the question why some property rights succeed and others fail. The articles validate the axiom that Form follows from Function aka Credibility Thesis, and study this in a wide range of areas such as informal tenure, land value capture, rural conflicts and nature management. The methods used include the Conflict Analysis Model, FAT Framework and the CSI Checklist. The collection is preceded by a substantial review of the research on the Credibility Thesis over the past decade. More info.
Random Question
“For instance, the historical ‘persistence’ of share-cropping (Byres 1983) led Cheung (1968) to conclude that it is efficient (i.e. credible and functional). That premise turns around the neo-liberal, neo-classical argument, but by no means entails that credibility or functionality is equal to harmony and peace.” P. Ho, “An endogenous theory of property rights: opening the black box of institutions”, Journal of Peasant Studies, 2016, 43/6, p. 1127.