RECOLAND

Land-Based Institutions in China

Skip to content
  • About
    • History
    • International cooperation
  • PROJECTS
    • Urban land and real estate
    • Rural land and informal housing
    • Rural land and Mining
    • Forest and titling
  • TEAM
  • EVENTS
    • Futures of public land and leasehold – China and Israel as strange-coupled twins
    • Justice and Land Use Ethics: John Rawls meets Aldo Leopold
    • Credibility as a Tool in Policy Analysis
    • PLPR Session on Credibility of Informality
      • Impressions from the triple session at the annual PLPR conference
    • Inaugural Conference on Titling and Spatial Planning
      • Media about the conference
    • Second EAEPE Panel on institutional function and credibility
    • TBM Workshop on Institutions
    • First EAEPE Panel on institutional function and credibility
  • PUBLICATIONS
    • Media
    • Publications
    • Videos
    • Chinese sources (中文)
  • THEORY & METHODS
    • Theory of credibility (plus video)
    • FAT Institutional Framework
    • CSI-Checklist
    • Conflict Analysis Model
  • Q&A
  • Contact
  • Theory

FAT Institutional Framework

The framework typically allows for a dynamic analysis of institutions through the inclusion of time. This is achieved by analyzing institutions at various time points, t1, t2….tx. More info: P. Ho, Unmaking China’s Development, Cambridge University Press, 2017, pp. 8-16. For applications, see e.g. Sun and Ho, 2020; Arvanitidis and Papagianitsis, 2020; Nor-Hisham and Ho, 2016.

 

Proudly powered by WordPress