Why does credibility theory oppose teleology?

Within neo-institutionalism, there is a group of scholars that assumes that the evolution of institutions has a certain purpose, directive principle, or ultimate goal. For instance, it is posited that institutions tend to evolve from informal to formal, from “second-best” to “best”, and from autocratic to democratic arrangements. On this issue, credibility theory states that: [ap_toggle title="READ MORE" status="close"]“Secure, democratic, and participatory institutions do not imply that they are credible. Contrarily, neither do insecure, autocratic, and (semi)authoritarian institutional arrangements mean that they are by definition non-credible or empty. In fact, democratic and transparent institutional arrangements, such as codes of good conduct or regulations for Corporate Social Responsibility (or CSR), might actually be disruptive in certain contexts, while autocratic, authoritarian, and non-transparent ones might not. (…) The credibility thesis makes no prediction of institutional teleology, nor does it pass moral judgment on institutional form, as it is concerned with function alone. Yet, the thesis does postulate that one might be able to gauge the extent to which institutions are credible or contested, as indicated – among numerous other indicators – by the level, incidence, and source of generated conflict.” See P. Ho, “ The ‘Credibility Thesis’ and its Application to Property Rights: (In)secure Land Tenure and Social Welfare in China ", Land Use Policy, 2014, 40, Sept, p. 23.[/ap_toggle]

RECOLAND – Land-Based Institutions in China

About

“That what ultimately determines the performance of institutions is not their form in terms of formality, privatization, or security, but their spatially and temporally defined function. In different wording, institutional function presides over form; the former can be expressed by its credibility, that is, the perceived social support at a given time and space. This postulate has here been dubbed the “credibility thesis”. (Peter Ho in Land Use Policy, 2014, Vol. 40, Sept., pp. 13-4) ...

Guggenheim NY: Chinese Villages

Posted on 3rd August 20203rd August 2020 by Main User

In parallel to decades of relentless urbanization, the Chinese government has, with much less fanfare and global attention, been dramatically redefining its countryside. This is the topic for a much acclaimed, well visited exhibition on the Chinese countryside by Rem Koolhaas, organized at the Guggenheim Museum in New York. Prof. Peter Ho acted as advisor to the project team. For impressions, ple...
Read More

Protected: Workshop: Credibility as a Tool in Policy Analysis?

Posted on 26th May 202027th May 2020 by Main User

This content is password protected. To view it please enter your password below: Password:
Read More

Call: Cambridge Elements on Global Development Studies

Posted on 14th May 202022nd May 2020 by Main User

Cambridge University Press has recently launched the Elements on Global Development Studies, a new short monograph series (20,000-30,000 words), that publishes ground-breaking, novel works that move beyond existing theories and methodologies of development to consider social change in real times and real spaces. The series is essentially inter-disciplinary and multi-disciplinary in nature as refl...
Read More

Credibility of Informality: Call for papers

Posted on 22nd November 201822nd November 2018 by Main User

For a special issue on the Credibility of Informality with regards to the property rights of urban housing, slums and land in an urban context, the journal Cities (SSCI, IF: 2.7) could consider high-quality papers. Papers that focus on informal property rights in regions except for China, i.e.: Latin America, Southeast Asia, Africa, Europe, North America, Australia, etc., ca...
Read More

Nail houses also appear outside China

Posted on 12th October 20189th June 2020 by Main User

"Even as its economy slows, China’s investment in real estate and infrastructure has lost little steam. A common problem for developers, though, is that especially in and around major cities plum land parcels are often already occupied. The solution? Evict the residents. Sometimes developers or local governments compensate or relocate those they kick out, usually offering less than the origin...
Read More

Book launch Unmaking China’s Development at Dutch Embassy

Posted on 16th May 201816th May 2018 by Main User

BEIJING On May 14, Peter Ho presented his new book 'Unmaking China's Development: The Function and Credibility of Institutions' at the Embassy of the Kingdom of The Netherlands (press release). The event was well-attended with representatives of the China Ministry of Natural Resources, Wall Street Journal, Ford Foundation, CITIC, Singapore Straits Times, and the Dutch Financial Daily. See below fo...
Read More

Interview marathon with architect Rem Koolhaas

Posted on 16th April 201818th April 2018 by Main User

WUZHEN In the beautiful town of Wuzhen, Rem Koolhaas, architect of the CCTV Building in Beijing and the Pritzker Prize laureate, hosted an “interview marathon”. During this event he held non-stop interviews on new trends in China's agriculture with leading intellectuals, artists, writers, planners and officials. Koolhaas engaged in the interviews through a high-speed video-conference link, each in...
Read More

Impressions from the triple session at the annual PLPR conference

Posted on 9th March 20177th April 2017 by Main User

Due to great interest of the session’s topic the PLPR organizers decided to allocate three slots for the session ‘Credibility of Informality’. This allowed for three inspiring sessions – chaired by Peter Ho, Rachelle Alterman and Benjamin Davy – with presentations on the related topics of planning, land and housing in a variety of contexts, including Israel, Serbia, China and Hong Kong. P...
Read More